Tuesday 9 September 2014

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING POLICIES. EFFECTIVE OR NOT? By Fawole Tolulope Aramide

INDEPENDENT CORRUPT PRACTICES AND OTHER RELATED OFFENCES COMMISSION CDS GROUP, OYO STATE.

PRESENTED BY: FAWOLE TOLULOPE ARAMIDE

STATE CODE: OY/13C/1366

TITLE: ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING POLICIES. EFFECTIVE OR NOT?

DATE: 3RD SEPTEMBER 2014


ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING POLICIES: EFFECTIVE OR NOT?

Money laundering, according to Wikipedia, “is the process whereby the proceeds of crime are transformed into ostensibly legitimate money or other assets.” In other words, the process by which money derived from criminal activities is converted into funds or assets which appear to have a legitimate origin. It involves taking criminal proceeds and disguising their illegal sources in anticipation of ultimately using the criminal proceeds to perform legal and illegal activities. In a manual, issued by the CBN in 2009, money laundering was defined as the process whereby criminals attempt to conceal the illegal origin and/or illegitimate ownership of property and assets that are the fruits or proceeds of their criminal activities. In 1996, it was estimated by the IMF that two to five percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product involves laundered money. In value, about $590 billion to $1.5 trillion is laundered worldwide annually. 

Money Laundering Activities- Predicate offence.
Money laundering predicate offence is the underlying criminal activity that generates proceeds which when laundered, results in the offence of money laundering. These crimes include: kidnapping, smuggling, embezzlement and fraud, robbery, drug trafficking, insider trading, illegal gambling, tax evasion, prostitution etc. Money obtained from these crimes is "dirty". It needs to be cleaned (laundered) to appear to have derived from non-criminal activities so that banks and other financial institutions will deal with it without suspicion. Money can be laundered by many methods, which vary in complexity and sophistication. Placing 'dirty' money in a service company, where it is layered with legitimate income, and then integrated into the flow of money is a common form of money laundering.

It involves three steps: the first step involves introducing cash into the financial system by some means ("placement"); the second involves carrying out complex financial transactions to camouflage the illegal source ("layering"); and the final step entails acquiring wealth generated from the transactions of the illicit funds ("integration"). Some of these steps may be omitted, depending on the circumstances; for example, non-cash proceeds that are already in the financial system would have no need for placement.

Methods of Money Laundering.
Money laundering takes several different forms, although most methods can be categorized into one of a few types. These include "bank methods, smurfing [also known as structuring], currency exchanges, and double-invoicing.

Structuring: Often known as smurfing, this is a method of placement whereby cash is broken into smaller deposits of money, used to defeat suspicion of money laundering and to avoid anti-money laundering reporting requirements. A sub-component of this is to use smaller amounts of cash to purchase bearer instruments, such as money orders, and then ultimately deposit those, again in small amounts.

Bulk cash smuggling: This involves physically smuggling cash to another jurisdiction and depositing it in a financial institution, such as an offshore bank with greater bank secrecy or less rigorous money laundering enforcement.

Bank capture: Money launderers or criminals buy a controlling interest in a bank, preferably in a jurisdiction with weak money laundering controls, and then move money through the bank without scrutiny.

Casinos: In this method, an individual walks into a casino with cash and buys chips, plays for a while, and then cashes in the chips, taking payment in a check, or just getting a receipt, claiming it as gambling winning.

Fictitious loans: An individual could claim money was loaned to him and have false documents created to back him up. This removes any suspicion regarding how they came about the supposedly large amount of money in the first place.

Real estate: Someone purchases real estate with illegal proceeds and then sells the property. To outsiders, the proceeds from the sale look like legitimate income. Alternatively, the price of the property is manipulated: the seller agrees to a contract that under represents the value of the property, and receives criminal proceeds to make up the difference.

Black salaries: A company may have unregistered employees without a written contract and pay them cash salaries. Dirty money might be used to pay them.

A goal of money laundering is to be able to use the dirty money for private consumption. If unable to use it openly, the traditional way to keep the dirty money near is hiding it as cash at home or other places. 
Notable Cases.
1.                  Institute for the Works of Religion: Italian authorities investigated suspected money laundering transactions amounting to US$218 million made by the IOR to several Italian banks.
2.                  Nauru: US$70 billion of Russian capital flight laundered through unregulated Nauru offshore shell banks, late 1990s
3.                  Sani Abacha: US$2–5 billion of government assets laundered through banks in the UK, Luxembourg, Jersey (Channel Islands), and Switzerland, by the president of Nigeria.
4.                  Standard Chartered: paid $330 million in fines for money-laundering hundreds of billions of dollars for Iran. The money-laundering took place in the 2000s and occurred for "nearly a decade to hide 60,000 transactions worth $250 billion"

Enforcement
Anti-money laundering (AML) is a term mainly used in the financial and legal industries to describe the legal controls that require financial institutions and other regulated entities to prevent, detect, and report money laundering activities. Anti-money laundering guidelines came into prominence globally as a result of the formation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the promulgation of an international framework of anti-money laundering standards. These standards began to have more relevance in 2000 and 2001, after FATF began a process to publicly identify countries that were deficient in their anti-money laundering laws and international cooperation.

An effective AML program requires a jurisdiction to have criminalized money laundering, given the relevant regulators and police the powers and tools to investigate; be able to share information with other countries as appropriate; and require financial institutions to identify their customers, establish risk-based controls, keep records, and report suspicious activities.

Criminalizing money laundering
The elements of the crime of money laundering are set forth in the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrophic Substances and Convention Against Transnational Crime. It is defined as knowingly engaging in a financial transaction with the proceeds of a crime for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property from governments.

Global Organizations working against money laundering
The FATF (Financial Action Task Force) is an intergovernmental body, formed in 1989 by the G7 countries, whose purpose is to develop and promote an international response to combat money laundering. The FATF Secretariat is housed in Paris at the headquarters of the OECD    (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). In October 2001, FATF expanded its mission to include combating the financing of terrorism. FATF is a policy-making body that brings together legal, financial, and law enforcement experts to achieve national legislation and regulatory AML and CFT reforms. As of 2014 its membership consists of 36 countries and territories and two regional organizations. Nigeria is not a member country. However, FATF works in collaboration with a number of international bodies and organizations including the Intergovernmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa. FATF has developed 40 recommendations on money laundering and 9 special recommendations regarding terrorist financing. FATF assesses each member country against these recommendations in published reports. Countries seen as not being sufficiently compliant with such recommendations are subjected to financial sanctions.
FATF’s three primary functions with regard to money laundering are:
1.                  Monitoring members’ progress in implementing anti-money laundering measures.
2.                  Reviewing and reporting on laundering trends, techniques, and countermeasures.
3.                  Promoting the adoption and implementation of FATF anti-money laundering standards globally.

Local laws put in place to prevent money laundering.
Money Laundering Prohibition Act,2011.(As amended)
In 2013, the CBN issued a circular to banks and other financial institutions titled: Amendment of anti money laundering/combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regulation,2009 (As amended) to align with Money Laundering (prohibition) Act(MLPA), 2011(As amended), Terrorism (Prevention) Act(TPA), 2011(As amended) and the Revised FATF 40 recommendations(2012).

The role of financial institutions
While banks operating in the same country generally have to follow the same AML laws and regulations, financial institutions all structure their AML efforts slightly differently. Today, most financial institutions globally, and many non-financial institutions, are required to identify and report transactions of a suspicious nature to the financial intelligence unit in the respective country. For example, a bank must verify a customer's identity and, if necessary, monitor transactions for suspicious activity. This is often termed as "know your customer". This means knowing the identity of the customer and understanding the kinds of transactions in which the customer is likely to engage. By knowing one's customers, financial institutions can often identify unusual or suspicious behavior, termed anomalies, which may be an indication of money laundering.
Bank employees, such as tellers and customer account representatives, are trained in anti-money laundering and are instructed to report activities that they deem suspicious. The CBN has mandated financial institutions to report all cash transactions in any currency above a threshold of   N1,000,000 for individuals and N5,000,000 for corporate bodies.

Financial institutions are required to report certain suspicious transactions to the NFIU(Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit) not later than 72 hours after their discovery or become liable to a fine of N1,000,000 for each day during which the offence continues.

Additionally, certain anti-money laundering software filters customer data, classifies it according to level of suspicion, and inspects it for anomalies. Such anomalies include any sudden and substantial increase in funds, a large withdrawal, or moving money to a bank secrecy jurisdiction. Smaller transactions that meet certain criteria may also be flagged as suspicious. For example, structuring can lead to flagged transactions. The software also flags names on government "blacklists" and transactions that involve countries hostile to the host nation. Once the software has mined data and flagged suspect transactions, it alerts bank management, who must then determine whether to file a report with the government.

Effective or not?
Despite the efforts made to tackle money laundering, there has been a rise in the cases money laundering and other financial crimes in Nigeria and the world at large. According to a publication in punch newspaper, operatives of the EFCC and Nigerian Customs Service arrested the son of Jigawa State Governor, Aminu Lamido at Malllam Aminu Kano International Airport Kano, for allegedly declaring only $10,000 instead of the $50,000 he had on him.

In a recent report, an international non-governmental organization, the Global Financial Integrity, stated that on the list of developing countries that lost $5.86 trillion through money laundering between 2001 and 2010 Nigeria occupied the seventh position with an illicit financial outflow of $129 billion. 

Some high profile corruption cases have remained inconclusive. The Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede-led Presidential Committee on Verification and Reconciliation of Fuel Subsidy Payments reported that about 197 subsidy transactions worth N232 billion in 2011 illegitimate. As usual, a few people are going through the symbolic prosecution while the public officials that approved the transactions remain untouchable. The country is in the throes of anarchy occasioned by terrorism, kidnapping and armed robbery because of the ease with which part of laundered money is used to import illegal arms and ammunition.

Conclusion: The fight against money laundering is a tough one. There is no doubt that all efforts to curb it have almost proved insufficient. However, it can be overcome if it is battled with a strong will by all those on whom the responsibility lies and those who have the political power to curtail it.  



References:
AML/CFT Training & Compliance Procedure Manual Slides, First Academy,2014.